I'd like to comment on your statement that "George Bush with all the resources of America cannot find Osama bin-Laden
Obviously you are against the President, however, what you've also neglected to include in your diatribe is that Former Pres Clinton was virtually handed Osama Bin Laden's head on a platter and neglected to do anything about it. Why not include that fact on your site.
Here's something for you to consider... if you had posted this message as an Iraqi against Hussein (which you couldn't even do under his dictatorship), you and more than likely your family would be rounded up and tortured for speaking out against Hussein. What is your solution for dealing with a man who has repeatedly lied about his arsenal of weapons and who has used millions of dollars in oil revenue, not for his own people, but rather to continue to build his weapons arsenal?
> The problem is that Saddam is not a threat to anyone. His missiles do not have nuclear warheads and they do not go more than 183 miles.
The Americans and British have been flying daily missions over north and south Iraq for twelve years. We have kept a close eye on him.
With all the U S technology, we have not been able to show the U N weapons inspectors where to look for all these weapons of mass destruction.
And as far as Saddam's dictatorship, there are dictators in Africa that make him look like a saint not to mention North Korea.
So are we invading Iraq out of fear or for humanitarian reasons or for OIL?
How can we manifest peace on earth if we do not include everyone (all races, all nations, all religions, both sexes) in our vision of Peace?
The WorldPeace Banner
To the WorldPeace Peace Page