|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Give
Iraqis reason to reject terror No,
United States President George Bush and 150,000 American troops won't be chased
from Iraq by the murder and mutilation of four U.S. civilian security agents.
Bush is not Bill Clinton, and Iraq is not Somalia.
The president's credibility is on the line as he faces re-election. He can't
cut and run. He crushed Saddam Hussein's tyranny at a cost of 13,000 Iraqi
lives, and promised democracy and stability to 23 million people. He can't now
let Iraq become what it was not before: An anarchic launch pad for terror. Nor
do most Americans want him to. They have $120 billion and 600 U.S. soldiers'
lives invested in this war.
Still, American nerves have been jangled by the Somalia-like images of
corpses being pulled from burning wreckage and hung on display. Like the images
of Saddam's statue being torn down, or of Saddam captured in his hiding-hole,
the charred bodies dangling from a bridge may become icons of this war, unless
they are eclipsed by worse. The horror in Falluja, near Baghdad, has left Americans looking for light at
the end of this tunnel. A majority now doubt the war was worth it.
Even the U.S. proconsul Paul Bremer sounded shaky yesterday as he denounced
the mobs in Falluja as "barbarians, cowards, ghouls, jackals." And
Brig.-Gen. Mark Kimmitt sounded surreal, talking of a "slight uptick"
in violence. Falluja was more than that.
The cheering, jeering crowds mocked Washington's attempt to depict attacks on
U.S. forces as the work of a few Saddam loyalists or imported terrorists. Those
were ordinary Iraqis dancing over American corpses. They are chafing under an
occupation they bitterly resent.
Nor will Kimmitt's ominous vow yesterday to "pacify that city" win
hearts and minds. Firefights in Falluja last week between U.S. Marines and
insurgents left a half-dozen civilians dead. That fuelled the crowd's fury this
week. What didn't work in Vietnam isn't likely to succeed in Iraq. With fewer than 100 days to go before Bush hands back "sovereignty"
to a hand-picked Governing Council on June 30, the occupation is a mess. The
majority Shias are unhappy with the political shape of the new regime. Some
Sunnis persist in open revolt. Despite Iraq's oil riches, half the workforce is
jobless and the rest earn a pittance. And while anti-American terror wasn't an
issue under Saddam, it assuredly is now.
Letting Iraqis retake ownership of their country is the way forward. They
need a reason to reject terror. Sovereignty is the first step. But Bush doesn't
envisage giving up control until Iraqis elect a parliament next year and form a
stable government. That day can't come too soon.
How can we manifest peace on earth if we do not include everyone (all races, all nations, all religions, both sexes) in our vision of Peace? The WorldPeace Banner
To the John WorldPeace Galleries Page
To the WorldPeace Peace Page |