Applications for Writs of Mandamus 
Pending in the Supreme COurt

            The following Applications for Writs of Mandamus were filed to put the Supreme Court on notice regarding the undeniable problems with the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure which the Supreme Court readopted on January 1, 2004.  The reality is that the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure are corrupt and unconstitutional.

• FIFTEEN    August 1, 2004 Relator's Application for Writ of Mandamus Regarding Void Orders
  (Cause No. 14-04-00726-CV; In re: John WorldPece, Fourteenth Court of Appeals, Harris County, Texas)
  
              SUMMARY:    This is a mandamus regarding Judge Fry's lack of jurisdiction per Rule 301 TRCP conformity, Rule 3.01 TRDP appointment, and Rule 4.06A TRDP standing.  WorldPeace's position is that Judge Fry had no standing and the entire Judgment for Disbarment is void.
  
              MEMORANDUM OPINION issued on August 12, 2004.

• FOURTEEN    March 30, 2004 Relator's Application for Writ of Mandamus
  (Cause No. 14-04-00292-CV; In re: John WorldPece, Fourteenth Court of Appeals, Harris County, Texas)
  
                  SUMMARY:    This is a mandamus regarding an automobile Deceptive Trade Practice lawsuit in Civil County Court at Law No. Four in Harris County where WorldPeace was illegally disqualified as attorney of record and the trial court refused to rule on a Motion to Recuse and proceeded to trial.  This is also regarding a civil suit in the 280th District Court involving a suit against a minister in which the court illegally disqualified WorldPeace as attorney of record for Joyce Wolter and stated in open court that the court was going to deny any and all motions regarding WorldPeace as a party in the lawsuit.
  
               NOTICE OF FILING submitted on April 1, 2004
  
              MEMORANDUM OPINION issued on June 29, 2004.

• THIRTEEN    March 10, 2004 Relator's Application for Writ of Mandamus Regarding Final Judgment in the 281st District Court and Dismissal of Appeal in the First Court of Appeals (Cause No. 04-0234; In re: John WorldPeace, Supreme Court of Texas)
  
                  SUMMARY:    This is a mandamus regarding the 281st District Court not having a final judgment and the First Court of Appeals dismissing the Appeal for Want of Prosecution.
  
                  DENIED without comment on April 16, 2004.
  
                  MOTION FOR REHEARING submitted on May 3, 2004
  
                              DENIED without comment on June 11, 2004.

• TWELVE    December 10, 2003 Relator WorldPeace's Application for Writ of Mandamus Regarding the Recusal of Respondent    (Cause No. 03-1139; In re:  John WorldPeace, Supreme Court of Texas)
  
                SUMMARY:    This is a mandamus regarding Judge Fry's Abuse of Discretion by not recusing himself from the underlying disciplinary petition.
  
             DENIED without comment on January 16, 2004.  The Supreme Court has determined that a Judge does not have to recuse himself due to multiple Abuses of Discretion.
  
              MOTION FOR REHEARING submitted on February 2, 2004
  
                          DENIED without comment on March 5, 2004.

• ELEVEN    December 3, 2003 Relator WorldPeace's Application for Writ of Mandamus Regarding the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure's Violations of the Equal Protection Guarantee of the Texas Constitution and the Texas Equal Rights Amendment    (Cause No. 03-1117; In re:  John WorldPeace, Supreme Court of Texas)
  
                SUMMARY:    The Commission for Lawyer Discipline manipulated the grievances against me into Allen Levine's committee where it was known that he would come back with a "just cause" finding and a suspension or disbarment recommendation.  The State Bar violated my constitutional rights of equal protection under Article 1 Section 3 and 3A of the Texas Constitution by discriminating against me for my religious activism specifically stating on my webpage that Ariel Sharon 's treatment of the Palestinians is similar to the treatment of the Jews by Adolf Hitler. (Short of Hitler's death camps)
  
             DENIED without comment on February 6, 2004.  The Supreme Court has determined that a non-attorney can determine which complaints move on as grievances and which are just complaints.  The Supreme Court has also allowed the State Bar to violate WorldPeace's equal protection rights against the Constitution.
  
              MOTION FOR REHEARING submitted on February 23, 2004
  
                         DENIED without comment on April 2, 2004 

• TEN     November 24, 2003 Relator WorldPeace's Application for Writ of Mandamus Regarding Res Judicata and Complainant Collins    (Cause No. 03-1084; In re:  John WorldPeace, Supreme Court of Texas)
  
                SUMMARY:    Judge Fry retried the Collins restitution matter that had been tried to conclusion in the 281st District Court.  The Commission's Plea to the Jurisdiction had not been granted in the 281st District Court and so the Final Judgment also barred the Commission from filing a second suit on WorldPeace.
  
              DENIED without comment on January 2, 2004.  The Supreme Court has determined that a complaint which was already tried can be tried again through the grievance process contrary to Rule 97(a) TRCP.
  
              MOTION FOR REHEARING submitted on January 20, 2004
  
                          DENIED without comment on April 23, 2004.  

• NINE     November 24, 2003 Relator WorldPeace's Application for Writ of Mandamus Regarding Judge Fry's Interlocutory Judgment for Disbarment and Defacto Disbarment of WorldPeace    (Cause No. 03-1083; In re:  John WorldPeace, Supreme Court of Texas)            
  
              SUMMARY:    Judge Fry attempted to use a defunct Mafrige "mother hubbard" clause to dismiss the majority of WorldPeace's counterclaims, refused to try the unadjudciated issues in the underlying lawsuit, and refused to set aside or modify his August 27, 2003, Judgment for Disbarment which is interlocutory.  The net effect has been to create a defacto disbarment of WorldPeace.  
  
              DENIED without comment on January 2, 2004.  The Supreme Court has determined that you can defacto disbar an attorney with an Interlocutory Judgment for Disbarment.
  
              MOTION FOR REHEARING submitted on January 20, 2004
  
              SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION FOR REHEARING submitted on April 2, 2004
  
                          DENIED without comment on April 23, 2004.  

• EIGHT     November 24, 2003 Relator WorldPeace's Application for Writ of Mandamus Regarding Judge Fry's Refusal to Rule on WorldPeace's Motions or Try the Unadjudicated Issues    (Cause No. 03-1082; In re:  John WorldPeace, Supreme Court of Texas)
  
              SUMMARY:    Judge Fry's refusal to set a hearing on WorldPeace's Motion to Compel Rule 3.01 documents which prove Molleston lied to the court and Judge Fry's refusal to try the unadjudicated issues in the underlying lawsuit.
  
              DENIED without comment on January 2, 2004.  The Supreme Court has determined that a judge does not have to adjudicate all issues in a disciplinary action and the attorneys at the State Bar can lie to the court at will.
  
              MOTION FOR REHEARING submitted on January 20, 2004
  
                          DENIED without comment on April 23, 2004.  

• FIVE   November 18, 2003 Relator WorldPeace's Application for Writ of Mandamus Regarding Expert Witnesses and Rule 1.03 (A & B) and 1.15(D) Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure    (Cause No. 03-1070; In re:  John WorldPeace, Supreme Court of Texas)
  
              SUMMARY:    Judge Fry did not require the Commission to put on an expert witness in the underlying lawsuit to prove up "a reasonably prudent and competent attorney" as is required to prove up Rule 1.03(a), 1.03(b), and 1.15(d) TDRPC violations.
  
              DENIED without comment on January 2, 2004.  The Supreme Court has determined that an Expert Witness is not necessary to prove a reasonable and prudent attorney in a disciplinary petition for violation of TDRPC rules that include the word reasonable or reasonable per the definitions but the some is required in a legal malpractice case.
  
              MOTION FOR REHEARING submitted on January 20, 2004     
  
                          DENIED without comment on April 23, 2004.     

• FOUR   November 13, 2003 Relator WorldPeace's Application for Writ of Mandamus Regarding Rule 41 TRCP (severed lawsuits) and Rule 174(b) (separate trials within one lawsuit)    (Cause No. 03-1049; In re:  John WorldPeace, Supreme Court of Texas)
  
              SUMMARY:    Judge Fry separated WorldPeace's mandatory counterclaims under Rule 174(b) TRCP when he ordered a Rule 41 TRCP severance at pretrial.  This is an abuse of discretion.
  
              DENIED without comment on December 19, 2003.  The Supreme Court has determined that sever does not mean sever.
  
              MOTION FOR REHEARING submitted on January 5, 2004
  
                       DENIED without comment on February 13, 2004.
  
  February 24, 2004,  Relator's Application for Writ of Mandamus Regarding Rule 41 TRCP (severed lawsuits) and Rule 174(b) (separate trials within one lawsuit)    (Cause No. 14-04-00172-CV; In re:  John WorldPeace, 14th Court of Appeals, Harris County, Texas) 
              (Filed in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals (Cause # 14-03-01339-CV; John WorldPeace v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, 14th Court of Appeals, Harris County, Texas)
  
              MEMORANDUM OPINION issued on June 29, 2004.

• THREE   November 10, 2003 Relator WorldPeace's Application for Writ of Mandamus Regarding Date of Disbarment and Plenary Power to the Supreme Court    (Cause No. 03-1022; In re:  John WorldPeace, Supreme Court of Texas)
  
              SUMMARY:    Judge Fry defacto disbarred WorldPeace by setting a disbarment date prior to the date the court's plenary power expired and the Judgment for Disbarment become enforcable.
  
              DENIED without comment on December 12, 2003.  The Supreme Court has determined that you can be disbarred when the disbarment is not enforceable.
  
              MOTION FOR REHEARING submitted on December 29, 2003
  
                          DENIED without comment on February 6, 2004.
  
  February 24, 2004,  Relator's Application for Writ of Mandamus Regarding Date of Disbarment and Plenary Power to the Supreme Court    (Cause No. 14-04-00170-CV; In re:  John WorldPeace, 14th Court of Appeals, Harris County, Texas) 
              (Filed in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals (Cause # 14-03-01339-CV; John WorldPeace v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, 14th Court of Appeals, Harris County, Texas)
  
              MEMORANDUM OPINION issued on June 29, 2004.

• TWO   November 10, 2003 Relator WorldPeace's Application for Writ of Mandamus Regarding Petitioner's Motion for No-evidence Summary Judgment to the Supreme Court    (Cause No. 03-1023; In re:  John WorldPeace, Supreme Court of Texas)
  
              SUMMARY:    Judge Fry granted Summary Judgment on issues that were never pled in the Commission's Second Motion for No-evidence Summary Judgment and granted Summary Judgment on issues to which no elements were pled by the Commission as required by Rule 166a(i).
  
              DENIED without comment on December 12, 2003.  The Supreme Court has determined that MUST dictate of Rule 166a(i) does not mean MUST in a disciplinary petition.
  
              MOTION FOR REHEARING submitted on December 29, 2003
  
                          DENIED without comment on February 6, 2004.
  
  February 24, 2004,  Relator's Application for Writ of Mandamus Regarding Petitioner's Motion for No-evidence Summary Judgment to the Supreme Court    (Cause No. 14-04-00171-CV; In re:  John WorldPeace, 14th Court of Appeals, Harris County, Texas) 
              (Filed in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals (Cause # 14-03-01339-CV; John WorldPeace v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, 14th Court of Appeals, Harris County, Texas)
  
              MEMORANDUM OPINION issued on June 29, 2004.